Bear in mind video game heads, before Grand Theft Auto the popular video game, there was Grand Theft Auto the movie. Also keep in mind that the two are not even remotely connected. The video game involves a thug committing real crimes, where as the Roger Corman movie involves two love birds who take off in daddy’s car to get hitched. Which one would you rather see? If you answered the video game, then you are in my boat.
Grand Theft Auto begins with screams from a mansion. Not because someone is being robbed, but because rich girl Paula Powers (Nancy Morgan) tells her parents she is marrying boyfriend Sam Freeman (Ron Howard) in Las Vegas. Not only do her parents disapprove of the Vegas wedding but they disapprove of the very average very middle class Freeman. Paula was already promised to Collins Hedgeworth (Paul Linke) but she wants nothing to do with the wealthy nutjob.
So the two lovebirds run away; or drive away rather in her dad’s Rolls Royce. Collins (who is probably funniest part of the whole movie) falls off his rocker when he hears the girl who has been promised to him has been “kidnapped.” The parents call up a local radio station and place a reward (which ends up being $50,000 in total) for their daughters return. Soon, everyone and their mother is looking to run the brown Rolls Royce off the road.
One by one, a car full of fools tries to apprehend the two lovers. And one by one they all fall into some non-lethal fireball of automotive explosion. The Rolls Royce goes by highway, then by short roads and even off-road and everytime remains untouched. The movie ends in a (big surprise) demolition derby. And that’s pretty much it. The movie is one brainless car crash after another. There are a few goofy characters that make the movie somewhat entertaining. 60s DJ, The Real Don Steele plays Curly Q. Brown, also a DJ in this movie who is more like a Fox News reporter than a DJ, but at least he has character. The Collins character is the only one who got any laughs out of me, but I wouldn’t consider him brilliant.
So whats the catch? Well back in 1977 Ron Howard offered to direct a movie for Roger Corman free of charge. This movie was, as you might expect, Grand Theft Auto; a movie that Ron and his father Rance co-wrote. Doing the movie for free would give Howard practice at directing a movie and would give Corman a free director. Howard received a typical Corman independently low budget and viola: You get Grand Theft Auto. Unfortunately Grand Theft Auto is a one trick pony whose trick is car accidents. It runs dry in all other areas and can’t be excused just be cause its billed as Oscar Winner Ron Howard’s first full length direction.
|
Tom Blain Rating: 2
 |
Review by:Tom Blain Classic film buff within the JAC stratosphere. (Warning: he took film classes.) | | Average Rating: | 5.762400 | Reviewers Last 5 Reviews
Solitary Man - 5 out of 10
James and the Giant Peach - 5 out of 10
My Neighbor Totoro - 8 out of 10
Ponyo - 6 out of 10
Up in the Air - 9 out of 10
|
Number of Movies Reviewed: | 202 |
| Median Rating: | 6 |
| Mode Rating: | 7 |
| Reader Ratings: | 6.259300 |
| Jackass Average: | 6.253700 |
| Reviewer is more stingy than your average Jackass. |
Similar reviews: Cinderella Man by Cinema Guru Boy - 8 out of 10. (Same director)
Ransom by Mike Long - 6 out of 10. (Same director)
Splash (20th Anniversary Edition DVD) by Mike Long - 7 out of 10. (Same director)
| VISITOR COMMENTS |
| said | November 25th, 2007 | Reply |
| i saw 1 in the shop san diego shop it name is gamestop |
| mangrove | September 30th, 2009 | Reply |
Clearly you don't appreciate classic drive-in cinema. Sure, it's a brainless movie, but it's also well directed and written. A great 70's time capsule.
Your review, however,stinks.
P.S. The word you wanted was "voila", not "viola", which is a small violin. Go back to playing stupid video games. |
| Tom | October 6th, 2009 | Reply |
Mangrove, clearly I don't appreciate cheap gag car explosions with little to no plot. I'm not a fan of the game, and don't play many video games, but I found myself desiring one while watching this film. As a 70s time capsule, I'll take dozens of films before this one. I understand it was made on the cheap (ie its a Corman film), but that doesn't make it any better. Cult film maybe, but its no major achievement.
Please prove your point of the movie being well written and directed. I fail to see it. If you mean, "its not horrible for Opie's first effort," then your standards are set lower than mine.
As far as spell checking me, good work. Your'e gold star is in the mail. |
|
|