Batman Begins review by Matt Fuerst
I generally like to start my reviews off with a little intro paragraph, so in preparing Batman Begins I thought it appropriate to reflect on the quality of all the Batman films. Then I paused a second or twenty and tried to figure out how many there were, and which ones I had seen. I remember Batman and Batman Returns but the rest had slipped my mind. IMDB refreshed my memory about Batman Forever and Batman and Robin. The Tim Burton directed Batman from 1989 and it was an impressive entry into the superhero genre. Burton mixed a good amount of wackiness, darkness, villains, Danny Elfman and Prince together to make a very good superhero flick. At the time I would have said excellent, but have you watched Batman lately? I have, and didn't think it aged like a fine Merlot. Batman Returns was a pretty good sequel as well. In fact it stands out pretty vividly in my memory. The introduction of an excellent villain in The Penguin and the mysterious Catwoman. As we all know, things got a little fuzzy after Returns, different people playing Batman, different ideologies from directors, some poorly paid villains. So the big question is: does Batman Begin exceed it's forefathers?

The basic breakdown of Begins works out as follows: Half of the movie is an origin story, and half is a Batman fights crime in Gotham City story. The stories aren't told completely linearly, instead director Christopher Nolan jumps around in time to try to explain the motivation of The Bat. I'll try to keep things vague here just in case you've lived under a rock. Young Bruce Wayne is the son of some very loaded bleeding heart parents. He suffers some serious early childhood trauma that sets him apart developmentally. We're talking some serious "Rosebud" type stuff here. Fast forward to Master Bruce's college years, he decides to detach himself from society and travels the world trying to conquer his fears. He eventually meets up with the mysterious League of Shadows who train him in their combat arts. Bruce eventually returns to Gotham to find the city falling apart, a real mess. He has all the money in the world, but realizes that money alone cannot fix a broken city being decayed at it's root by crime. Instead, he decides to root out crime by fighting it.

Thus Batman dons his suit and does what superheroes do. The second half of our story begins as various villains, some with powers and some simply bad people are rooted out by The Bat. This part of the film heats up, though it at time wanders in search of a direction. The overall point of the second half is that a plot to destroy Gotham is afoot and it's up to Batman alone to foil it. This storyline is moved forward in one quick spurt at a time, then the movie returns to the miscellaneous other storylines that are being juggled: an employee of Wayne Enterprises being unjustly fired, the CEO of Wayne Enterprises being evil, a Mafia boss who may have played a role in young Bruce's childhood trauma, the damsel being intimidated by thugs. All of these interesting elements are jammed into the second half of the movie.

The second half of the movie really tickled my happy spot, but I thought it suffered from a problem similar to that of another comic book movie, Constantine. They just tried to stuff too much story into one film. The pacing of the movie isn't helped by the decision to overplay the origin story, which probably takes up half of the movie and I felt was far weaker. To me it felt like the origin backstory was an attempt to legitimize the film, and appease people who would turn their nose up at a "superhero" movie. Yes, the motivations of Batman are important and set the tone for what he does in the future, but I'd imagine the first time it was told in comic book form it lasted all of 4 or 5 pages. Here it's stretched out for a full hour much to the sacrifice of the rest of the movie.

Many elements of the movie I really rolled my eyes at when viewed out of context, but just managed to work within the film. I saw a shot of the new Batmobile well before the film hit the theatres and found myself groaning in pain. What a horrible looking piece of machinery. But I have to admit, it was gleeful to watch it rumble around Gotham and made me quite giddy. It's a fun piece of comic book goodness. The imagery of the the main villain (I believe the villain details are kept pretty secret in the media so I'm keeping this vague) is spectacular and probably the best done villain in a comic book movie ever.

As evidenced by my review, I'm a man torn. I'm a comic book guy and I occasionally buy Batman books. The Batman I like uses his intelligence and detective skills to fight crime. Superheroes down to street thugs, Bats has taken them all on and won using his wits, brawn and cunning. There's a lot of that present in Batman Begins, but there's a lot of other cruft I really could have lived without. If you weren't particularly excited about another Batman entry I can't in good conscious encourage you to see Batman Begins. If you like Batman or superhero flicks there's plenty here to entertain you, but you will notice a few bumps along the road.
Matt Fuerst Rating: 7 1 Jackass 1 Jackass 1 Jackass 1 Jackass 1 Jackass 1 Jackass 1 Jackass
Number of Hits: 8505 Recent: 2242 Review by:Matt Fuerst
Is actually 51st in line as the heir to Liberaces fortune. Only 50 more deaths to fake as accidents...
Average Rating:5.697200
Reviewers Last 5 Reviews

Triangle - 9 out of 10
The French Connection - 8 out of 10
Sleepwalking - 3 out of 10
Birds of America - 1 out of 10
Dexter: Season 2 - 3 out of 10
Number of
Movies Reviewed
:
109
Median Rating:6
Mode Rating:5
Reader Ratings:5.266700
Jackass Average:6.253700
Reviewer is more stingy than your average Jackass.


Similar reviews:
Batman Begins by The Grim Ringler - 9 out of 10. (Same movie, different reviewer)
Following by Matt Fuerst - 10 out of 10. (Same director)
Insomnia by Yoosuf - 7 out of 10. (Same director)
Memento by Da Bonghit - 8 out of 10. (Same director)
Blade - Trinity by The Grim Ringler - 7 out of 10. (Same writer)
Blade 2 by The Grim Ringler - 9 out of 10. (Same writer)
Batman : Dead End by The Grim Ringler - 9 out of 10. (Same series)
The Machinist by Mike Long - 8 out of 10. (Same actor)
Wonder Boys by Matt Fuerst - 9 out of 10. (Same actor)
The Death of Batman by The Grim Ringler - 7 out of 10. (Same series)
Rescue Dawn by Rosie - 10 out of 10. (Same actor)
VISITOR REVIEWS
Average User Rating is a 9
10July 16th, 2006
Drunky7October 19th, 2005
I finally saw this. I should start by saying I really like what Nolan TRIED to do in almost every aspect of this movie. I just think in the end the vision was not executed well at all. Like Fuersty said, most of the movie felt forced. As if Nolan was just checking things of his list as he went along: "Bruce Wayne acts like a playboy - CHECK!" The whole movie I felt like a fish trying to bite the worm on the hook but can't because the stupid fisherman keeps jerking the line out of the water right after the cast just to immediately re-cast, repeat, repeat. The hook never gets a chance to sink in. Disappointing.
New Review

VISITOR COMMENTS
expertNovember 1st, 2005Reply
I loved Begins too! To be honest I hated Batman Forever AND B & Robin with a passion. Returns I remember being disappointed apon its July release back in 1992 but not totally devistated. The last two were just garbage and it made me mad when Forever was released and a buddy told me he liked it. Begins is pure fun because you get to see Wayne make his transformation into Batman in a totally plausable way. If someone were rich enough it's believeble he could come up with some of the contraptions Batman has, he'd probably get killed once on the streets but believeably concieved. Bale makes a good standout next to Keaton's low key creepy intensity. He matches Keaton's intensity with much more in the mask. The only thing Keaton has on Bale is the creepiness as Wayne, Bale's Wayne is too much a pretty boy, while Keaton's was a sad, lonely, tiny bit weird one. But Bale does make a more creepier Batman then Keaton did. Kilmer and especially Clooney don't even count. Val Kilmer was a jerk and Clooney was almost non-existent. Begins suceeds because of the actors, and the transformation into Batman. My only gripe is the way they chose to edit the fights which are unengaging to say the least, and the repetitive score by Hans Zimmer. The only time Zimmer shows some punch is during Wayne's escape from the league of ninjas, after that the score gets VERY boring even the during the chase with the new batmobile. During that moment i really missed Danny Elfman's original score. But other than those tiny gripes Begins is a total success by all means. A-
    TomNovember 1st, 2005
 Yeah I hear you on the last two. The Schumacher films were just awful. I saw the 3rd one in the theater and the 4th one I wouldnt pay money to see. I just saw bits and pieces on TV and wasn't impressed.

I think going from Burton to Schumacher really disappointed a lot of fans. It went from being the dark comic book movie to the campy tv show. Probably losing Keaton as Batman ruined the continuity as well. Not that he was the best Batman, but once you get used to him in the first two its tough to transition in to Val Kilmer/Clooney.
Enter your comment: (No HTML allowed)
Name:
REPEAT NUMBER:
<-You must enter NUMBER for post to save!
E-Mail
(Optional):
Comment: