In the
legendary horror/sci-fi series of Alien films only two of the four films
are considered truly ‘classic’ and are accepted as the ‘good’ parts of the
series. The other two films, Alien 3, and Alien Resurrection are
considered little more than bastard children that were better off in a state of
non-existence. And while I can say that I concur when it comes to Resurrection
(bad writing and a weak plot really killed it more than anything, which is a
shame since Joss Whedon is a pretty good writer but he was trying to do
too much with the film) I completely disagree when it comes to the third Alien
film, which, in my mind is a highly underrated entry in the series.
Recently I was able to buzz through the astounding Alien Quadralogy (I
didn’t partake of the extras which is why there is no review of the set) and
got to watch all four films again and was able to re-evaluate them all and
honestly, of the four, the only entry that makes me cringe is the last entry,
which is almost worse in its extended version.
Alien 3 find
Ripley alone and stranded on a prison planet, the ship she, the little girl
Newt, the android, and the space marine were having suffered a security breach
which sent the survivors of Aliens out into space in an escape pod which
crash landed. Ripley is the lone survivor on this planet and her heartbreak at
hearing this is brilliantly under-played so that by this point, Ripley almost
expects the worst. Which is what she has to deal with. This prison planet is
essentially a dead world that is mined by men who have committed such heinous
crimes as to be forgotten to society and all they want is to live out their
days on this world and wait for the Rapture. Ripley appearing throws a wrench
into that plan though as suddenly their darker desires are awakened and they
look at Ripley with the eyes of predators. There is something far worse that
has come to this world with Ripley though and it is soon loosed from the belly
of a dead bull and begins hunting the prisoners one by one and Ripley must face
a familiar nightmare. The twist though is that this time it is Ripley that
is as much an enemy as the alien as she is carrying what we find out is a queen
within her and there is nothing she can do to stop its birth. As the inmates
agree to work with Ripley to trap and kill the alien the Company has gotten
word that there is another alien that lives and so send a team out to capture
it, and Ripley, alive. And when the initial plan to trap the alien fails and it
is freed from its initial prison and begins thinning the numbers of the inmates
it is up to Ripley and the patriarch and religious leader of the prison, a man
that hates Ripley for the disruption she has brought with her, to stop the
beast before it can be captured and studied by the Company that began
everything in the first film.
To a
degree, I can see why people dislike this film so much. It is very slow, very
dark, and has the darkest story of all four films. Your cast is full of
murderers, rapists, thieves, and an unsympathetic warden and his intelligence
impaired second in command. The story also essentially says – there is no way
to save Ripley, Ripley must die, and then it sets out to kill her. This was
filmed with the intention of ending Ellen Ripley’s story and a lot of people
didn’t want to see that. And that it begins with the death of the people that
you cheered for when they survived the Aliens is asking you, as an
audience member, to let go of the investment you made in these previous
characters. To have them die off screen like that is beyond anti-climactic, it’s
downright cruel.
So why do I love it?
I love the
balls of this film. They knew they were making a dark film and they bloody well
made it. How do you compete with Alien and Aliens? You don’t, and
to try would be madness. Instead they created a story that is much akin to the
first – one alien in a dark, dirty, womb-like place. I also love that as much
as it is about Ripley, it isn’t as well. It’s about these monstrous men
and their lives, and their deaths as much as it is about anything. In the
extended version you get a lot more ‘story’ and a lot more of the interactions
between the prisoners, thus investing more interest into them. But the last
thing you want to do is cheer for what are essentially monsters, but you do.
And of the four films, this is the one that gives Sigourney Weaver the
most to work with and the toughest challenges. We see her tough as ever here,
but there is a sadness to her as she has now lost not just friends and her
natural daughter but her adoptive daughter as well. And now she is to be the
mother to a queen alien. She is the host of the thing that haunts her
nightmares. We also finally see a sexual side to Ripley when she and the prison’s
doctor have a brief moment together. In Alien 3 we are finally given a
full picture of Ripley the woman and not just as the angry or scared fighter. This
is a very unpleasant film and is meant to be. The film has a dirty, grimy,
awful look that reminds one of a sewer and you never feel comfortable with this
film. And the alien of question is more animalistic and is shown as little as
possible, upping the fear factor and returning the series to its roots.
Filled with
religious symbolism, as well as bringing back the themes of motherhood with
Ripley, and in that case turning it to a darker meaning, this is also the most
thought provoking film. In the film we have society’s castoffs that are called
on to kill a beast that could theoretically destroy the human race. And Ripley,
a character we have developed a very strong attachment for, turns from mother
to martyr (they thankfully eradicate the chest-bursting scene as she is diving
to her death that was in the theatrical version) and gives a tragic yet fitting
end to her character. If only they’d let her die and stay dead! Director Fincher
took on a project that seems cherry in theory but which he could never have
won with. To have to follow the other two Alien films is a thankless job
for any director and no matter how good the film was it never would have
succeeded. To me though it did. He created a dark, scary, heartbreaking finale
to a much beloved series. He ended it with class, intelligence, and without
compromising the character. Is it perfect? No. It’s obsessively dark and brooding
and is full of characters that you cannot really care about as hard as you
might try. But this film is, at its core, about Ripley and her alien and
the fight they have had, which is to a degree just in name alone, since the
first film. You have the mother versus the monster. Life versus death. Hope versus
damnation. And in the end, the alien within her is as much her baby as her own
daughter was and she chooses to destroy it, and herself, before she will let
the Company use it for their own purposes.
Maybe I love
Alien 3 so much is because it’s a big screw you to everyone that
loves the movies. It takes the series into a direction we never expected and
ends things with as crushing a blow as you could imagine. It’s my hope that if
you can, you will track down the extended version of A3 and will give it
a second chance. Let go of the hype. Let go of the false promises of aliens on
the earth that had been boasted about before the film was released, and just
watch it for what it is. If only other series’ would have this kind of moxy
with their characters (James Bond, I am looking at you kid).
…c… |
The Grim Ringler Rating: 8
Similar reviews: Fight Club by Tom Blain - 9 out of 10. (Same director)
Return of the Living Dead by The Grim Ringler - 8 out of 10. (Same writer)
Dead and Buried by The Grim Ringler - 7 out of 10. (Same writer)
The Village by The Grim Ringler - 6 out of 10. (Same actor)
Zodiac by Tom Blain - 9 out of 10. (Same director)
VISITOR REVIEWS Average User Rating is a 8 |
| 10 | July 16th, 2006 |
|
| arrtee121 | 7 | January 10th, 2004 |
i consider myself a fan of the alien series (tho i did not invest in the new 9 disc dvd set, i own the previous "legacy"). the third alien movie has always been one of the most talked about, and rightfully so as it definitely did not hold the strength of the first two. i feel that people who dislike alien 3 generally hate it for it's darkness and change of direction from the happy ending of the 2nd flick. -- it bothers me too. However, alien 3 in itself is bold and manages to be compelling. it gives us a look at david fincher, an amazing director, who will later bring us some great flix. personally, i think alien 3 warms up after repeated viewings if you're a fan. for casual viewers of the alien series, it may be bothersome but then we have the pure horror of 'resurrection' to talk about...
not the weakest of the 4 in my humble opinion, but not reaching "ALIEN" or "ALIENS" |
| Tom Blain | 6 | January 9th, 2004 |
The first one broke the ground. For its time it was pretty incredible and creepy.
The second one is on another level. We are done just peeking in on the Aliens territory... knocking down the door, inside the house, and cruising through the family albums. I am not a huge Cameron fan, but his work on the 2nd is some of the best sci-fi ever.
The third one was highly anticipated...by me at least. When I saw it in the theatres it was a bit of a letdown compaired to the first two. As Grim stated already, this is a bold task for anyone to take over. But all in all, its still a superb suspenseful film, with enough creepy elements from the 2nd to keep you going.
Interestingly enough, its one of Fincher's earliest, non-video directions. That guy doesn't do light topics. He jumps into the ultra creepy, and takes off. Here is no exception. |
| VISITOR COMMENTS |
| Jon | January 14th, 2004 | Reply |
I believe that this movie ruined the series. 20th Century Fox should have loosened up and let Vincent Ward write a script that didn't suck, his initial idea. It was a travesty to kill those characters off-screen. Unacceptable.
However, as an individual movie, it's mediocre, to say the most. Not quite as good as Resurrection, but nowhere near worthy of being placed in the same package with Alien and Aliens. |
| Juan | January 23rd, 2005 | Reply |
I have always enjoyed the alien movies, with the exception of Ressurrection. I loved the first because of its haunted house feeling, the second because of its Vietnam theme. But the third film, at first I was a bit skeptical about it since I heard bad reviews about. But once I actually sat down and took a look at it, I realized how underrated this film really is.
Sure it might not be as mysterious and suspenful as the first two, but hey come on this film isn't as bad as people made out to be. It is dark, brooding, and gloomy for a reason: It was meant to be the 'true' final installment of the alien saga. With much religious factor in it and with the ending it had I thought it was a great film with a perfect ending to it. For once let us have a film that has a dark and gloomy ending rather than a happy-go-lucky one. Out of ten I give it an eight. |
| Novmbr17 | June 19th, 2006 | Reply |
| Having at last seen the special edition of Alien3, I now appreciate this work so much more. The power of all three films is in the subversion of the 'natural' mother/child relationship, and in the marriage of horror and eroticism. To that end, Alien3 is just as appropriate a dialogue as the first two installments. I just don't understand why in the theatrical release the alien was born from a dog... in what, to my mind, was perhaps the most vicious scene in the series... yet in the special edition it is born from a dead bull?? That little change rather robs the film of some of its power. |
| Jason | June 17th, 2007 | Reply |
| Alien 3 sucked mega big time. I hated it when it came out and I still hate it now after the special edition. I am not against dark movies. The Empire Strikes Back for instance is my favourite of the original Star Wars trilogy but this was just plain and utter crap. The killing of Newt and Hicks is an insult to fans and James Cameron's fantastic work on Aliens. There are holes in the script big enough a truck can drive through. Firstly the big question 'how the egg got on the Sulaco is never adequately explained and is a insult to the audiences intelligence'. Secondly it had been established from the previous movies that a face hugger lays one chest burster inside a host, then falls off and dies. The facehugger in Alien 3 however must have laid two. One in Ripley and the other in the dog (or ox in the special edition). When did this suddenly become possible. If a facehugger can lay more than one chestburster then why do they need a queen to lay so many eggs. Again insulting to the audience. The story could have been so much better. It really is the worst of the entire series. Alien Resurrection is better but not by much. Lets hope that Ripley just wakes up somewhere in Alien 5 and that Alien 3 was just all a bad dream. I have read that David Finchley has disowned himself from this movie. Good on you David, I would too. Its an embarrassment to your subsequent fine work. |
| matt | August 12th, 2008 | Reply |
| it might be the worst of the originals but it was better than half the stuff the crap that made up Alien versus Predator and the sequal like that hybrid that lays a ten embyo litter in a person or in alien ressurection where the queen had a human reproductive system but im wokin on the 5th one so it will be done right |
|
|