Rebecca review by Tom Blain

Hitchcock’s First Hollywood Deal

If you have read my reviews or at least perused them, you will notice that I am a fan of Alfred Hitchcock's work. I will say that it was probably the master of suspense himself that pulled me out of the “Star Wars Syndrome.” The “Star Wars Syndrome” is what I call the state in which a movie-goer will not watch a movie favorably if it was done before the ‘Holy Trilogy.’ I was once in that mindset and I believe it was Rear Window that pulled me out. At that point I became entranced by Hitchcock’s dark classics. Rebecca was Hitchcock’s entry way into Hollywood. He had done well for himself in his homeland of England (The Lodger, Lady Vanishes) and powerhouse producer David O. Selznick, fresh off of his glorious success with Gone with the Wind thought he would try his hand a Hitchcock. In Rebecca he was hoping to harness the director’s talents in the genre of harlequin romance, a genre where Selznick had reaped bountiful success. Rebecca was considered a success (Selznick picked up the Oscar for Best Film), but in terms of Hitchcock films seems a bit slow and lethargic.

Rebecca, the character, is the most talked about, admired and hated character in this film but you never see her. You guessed it, she is dead. Her presence/ghost still haunts the walls and rooms of her former home, Mandelay. Her widowed husband Maxim De Winter (Lawrence Olivier) has since remarried a younger, more naïve woman (Joan Fontaine) who goes without a name (“hey you”, ”Mrs. De Winter”). Maxim seems to be broken up over the death of Rebecca: he never seems happy, jumps into violent outrages, and almost jumps off a cliff. His young wife is constantly compared to her and constantly falls short. Rebecca was a woman of noble class, intelligent, strong, commanding, and most important breathlessly beautiful. The simple “second Mrs. De Winter” can’t even hold up her own against the brooding Mrs. Danvers, Mandelay’s chief maid. Mrs. Danver’s is a mean, spirited, and somewhat insulted that Maxim would marry under Rebecca’s standards. Her loyalty to Rebecca’s legacy creates a friction between her and the new wife. In one of the more moving scenes, she stands at an open window with the crying Joan Fontaine urging her to end her life, and jump to her death.

This film is know for its battle for control over the final cut between producer David Selznick and director Alfred Hitchcock. Hitchcock grew up in movies as a storyboard writer back in the silent days and this carried over to his directorial career. In Rebecca, like all his other films, he storyboarded each and every shot making the camera work and shooting completely efficient. This didn’t sit well with Selznick, however, who liked to have a number of shots to cut and chose from. Selznick eventually went back and filmed more scenes after Hitchcock had left the set and inserted them into the movie. The story itself was a battle as well. The struggle for piece of mind, and solving the mystery of both Maxim’s personality and Rebecca’s death are obviously points the work of Hitchcock. He also accentuated the character of Mrs. Danvers who ended up being the most evil and obviously most interesting character in the film. Selznick wasn’t interested in the ‘macabre,’ he expected Rebecca to be more of a romance between Olivier and the up-and-coming cardboard actress Joan Fontaine. In the end, you end up seeing elements of both minds and the film becomes a bit disjointed. Afterwards, however, Hitchcock went on to become a critical and popular success and Selznick went insane trying to achieve the greatness he had with Gone with the Wind.

There is a neat twist at the end but you really have to wait through a lot of crap for it. There is a severe lack of chemistry between Fontaine and Olivier due to Olivier’s mysterious character, and also his lack of respect for Fontaine’s acting. You can see what he is talking about too: she lacks delivery and presence. I just don’t buy it. Then again I don’t buy Olivier either. Mrs. Danvers is evil enough to scare the devil. I don’t know who could live in a house with her making your bed. Her character is the most fun to watch. Overall the movie lacks fire. It starts as a romance, gets a little darker about an hour later, and then things start to shape up by an hour and thirty, but you will probably fall asleep before then. There are some standard Hitchcock moments, but they aren’t as good as the ones in his other films, and you can probably find them on some AMC special on his birthday anyway. Look elsewhere for your Hitchcock fix, unless you are trying to fill up your Criterion Collection library.

Tom Blain Rating: 4 1 Jackass 1 Jackass 1 Jackass 1 Jackass
Number of Hits: 7930 Recent: 2331 Review by:Tom Blain
Classic film buff within the JAC stratosphere. (Warning: he took film classes.)
Average Rating:5.762400
Reviewers Last 5 Reviews

Solitary Man - 5 out of 10
James and the Giant Peach - 5 out of 10
My Neighbor Totoro - 8 out of 10
Ponyo - 6 out of 10
Up in the Air - 9 out of 10
Number of
Movies Reviewed
:
202
Median Rating:6
Mode Rating:7
Reader Ratings:6.259300
Jackass Average:6.253700
Reviewer is more stingy than your average Jackass.


Similar reviews:
Frenzy by John - 4 out of 10. (Same director)
Notorious by Tom Blain - 10 out of 10. (Same director)
Rope by Tom Blain - 8 out of 10. (Same director)
Strangers on a Train by Tom Blain - 7 out of 10. (Same director)
The 39 Steps by Tom Blain - 7 out of 10. (Same director)
Rope by Tom Blain - 8 out of 10. (Same director)
The Birds by The Grim Ringler - 8 out of 10. (Same director)
To Catch A Thief by Tom Blain - 7 out of 10. (Same director)
Strangers on a Train by Tom Blain - 7 out of 10. (Same director)
VISITOR REVIEWS
Average User Rating is a 0
No reader reviews yet
New Review

VISITOR COMMENTS
June 15th, 2004Reply
monicaOctober 29th, 2004Reply
Joan fontaine was treated so badly by Olivier and Hitchcock, her acting reflected this, and it was what Hitchcock wanted anyway.
TCJanuary 14th, 2007Reply
The film definately wasnt that great. And yes the storyline did seem disjointed. almost as if it was made up on the way. But nevertheless it was cool.

the above review is cool. and i agree with most things (actually with only a few ...why most of the things were new and quite interesting to me) but saying the second mrs de winter (and no i didnt notice she never had a name lol) portrayal was 'cardboard' is actually wrong.
The actress was able to bring to life a very timid character that makes the audience very annoyed at her lack of assertiveness. But u cant deny that the time when she stood up for herself wasnt a relief. hell it was breathtaking emotional. because she was crying prior and then she shaped up. it was cool

The suspence was great throught. and the end was wonderful.
Enter your comment: (No HTML allowed)
Name:
REPEAT NUMBER:
<-You must enter NUMBER for post to save!
E-Mail
(Optional):
Comment: